When Minister for Industry and Science Ed Husic announced an inquiry last year into how artificial intelligence would be regulated, it felt like Australia was trying to play catch up.
At the time, every government seemed to be announcing an approach to AI. The EU had already positioned itself as a leader in setting an international standard with plans for its AI Act — much as it has done with its privacy regulation. The UK wanted to be seen as a welcome port for industry, while also trying to lead on AI safety.
Get The Edition in your inbox
Signed up to The Edition
A must-read afternoon newsletter. Free to join, read by decision makers and featuring our top stories.
Update and view your
newsletter preferences in your account.
A must-read afternoon newsletter. Free to join, read by decision makers and featuring our top stories.
Update and view your
newsletter preferences in your account.
What would Australia do? For months this has been an open question, as the government was flooded with responses to its discussion paper, and perhaps a little overwhelmed.
Husic has now shown us just where Australia might end up on AI regulation. It's an approach that reflects Australia’s positioning in the APAC region, rather than trying to emulate a European model.