When Donald Trump was inaugurated as US president in January last year, much of the early coverage — including at Capital Brief — was around the strategy of ‘muzzle velocity’, a term coined by former consigliere Steve Bannon.
The logic was simple. After a chaotic first term hampered by bungled hires, hostile media, a scattershot strategy and a bureaucracy resistant to some of Trump’s more out-there schemes, the new administration was going to hit the ground running.
Get The Edition in your inbox
Signed up to The Edition
A must-read afternoon newsletter. Free to join, read by decision makers and featuring our top stories.
Update and view your
newsletter preferences in your account.
A must-read afternoon newsletter. Free to join, read by decision makers and featuring our top stories.
Update and view your
newsletter preferences in your account.
It would “flood the zone”, as Bannon put it, with so much action that a demoralised opposition wouldn’t be able to agree on what was even happening, let alone fight it.
A year later, that frame feels almost quaint. Between the extraordinary military operation in Venezuela, the barely veiled threats against Greenland, and a habit for heterodox economic policy (punitive tariffs, taking ownership stakes in American companies, caps on credit card rates) the administration’s posture looks less like velocity than deliberate disintegration.