Shiffman has been ordered to pay legal costs for Sleeping Duck’s founders and another investor after losing his court case against the mattress company.
Shiffman v Sleeping Duck
Coverage of the Adir Shiffman v Sleeping Duck trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
The case of Adir Shiffman v Sleeping Duck offers a rare insight into the tactics of those angels who typically invest alone and in a very different way to conventional VCs.
The angel investor just lost an almost three-year court battle with the founders of mattress company Sleeping Duck, but insists it won't change his approach to startups.
In a much anticipated judgment delivered late Friday, Supreme Court of Victoria Judge Jim Delaney rejected Adir Shiffman's case against Sleeping Duck.
The closing arguments of the Shiffman v Sleeping Duck trial served up a question familiar to all investors and founders: how do you value a startup?
The closely watched court case has provided much more than just an insight into the critical relationship between investors and founders of startup companies.
The court saw heated cross examinations ahead of a pause before closing arguments are heard later in November.
Melbourne-based investor Adir Shiffman has said his dispute with Sleeping Duck is beyond 'his wildest nightmares.' Here's what we know three weeks into the trial.
Adir Shiffman's cross examination in his Sleeping Duck lawsuit is focused on how much Shiffman knew about fellow minority investor - Prateek Bandopadhayay - and when.
Lawyers for Melbourne investor Adir Shiffman have laid out their opening arguments in his court dispute with Sleeping Duck, as a 10-day trial gets under way.
Prominent investor Adir Shiffman is taking portfolio company Sleeping Duck to court in a case that will be closely watched by the startup community.
