Skip to content

High Court of Australia




The High Court is finally getting down to the real issues in shareholder class actions.


The native title battle between the Yindjibarndi people of the Pilbara and mining giant Fortescue will likely end up in the High Court — again.


Justice Robert Beech-Jones’ combative speech took aim at a conservative legal society — and exposed tensions inside the High Court.


Newsletter Prima Facie

Zip zapped

Zip Co might have lost its trade mark battle with Firstmac, but the case has settled a tricky area of intellectual property law.



The High Court’s May sittings open with a case that has media outlets and content creators on high alert over copyright and covert footage.





Norman O’Bryan’s fall from grace has been staggering. Now the former barrister faces the prospect of jail.





Shareholder class actions are heading to the High Court for a landmark test on materiality and damages, following a string of courtroom defeats.


Australia’s largest bank was found to have breached its disclosure obligations leading up to the $700 million AUSTRAC settlement. Now the High Court will decide whether it will have to pay for it.


The High Court will hear a case that could settle the issue of whether cryptocurrency is property capable of possession.



It's the busiest day of the legal year, but all eyes are on a trio of fascinating High Court cases set down for 2026.




A messy announcement underscored the wider breakdown in the relationship between the Chinese and Australian partnerships of King & Wood Mallesons.


Newsletter The Edition

Fare fight

Uber is heading to the High Court to challenge an $82 million payroll tax ruling, in a case that could reshape how Australia taxes the gig economy.





The Commonwealth may have “won” the Russian embassy case in the High Court, but it will still have to fork out millions in compensation.




What is stopping King & Wood Mallesons — or at least its Australian arm — from finally pulling the pin on its 13-year alliance?



High Court justice Simon Steward says it is "only a matter of time" before directors face court for involving their companies in social and political debates.


The Katy Perry v Katie Perry legal battle is “a rare and valuable opportunity” for the High Court to resolve important questions about reputation and trademarks.



Justice Jacqueline Gleeson is shaping as a High Court swing vote, while Justice James Edelman seems content in his role as the bench's soloist.